Processing math: 0%

Sunday, February 9, 2014

Catastrophe!

Let me present for your consideration a rather frightening mass of algebra:B_{\lambda}(T) = \frac{2hc^2/\lambda^5}{e^{hc/\lambda kT}-1} That's the Planck function, which describes the radiation curve of a perfect blackbody as a function of its temperature--the constants in it are wavelength (\lambda), the speed of light (c, as always), the Boltzmann constant k, and Planck's constant h. This equation was the result of centuries of head-scratching on the part of physicists, who had noticed fairly early on that a blackbody would emit light at different temperatures depending on how hot it was. The first real attempts to model this phenomenon led to the Wien Approximation, which accurately described short-wavelength emission, and Rayleigh-Jeans Law, which accurately described long-wavelength emission. However, under a contemporary understanding of physics, Rayleigh-Jeans also implied that a blackbody contained an infinite amount of energy due to the presence of an infinite number of infinitesimally short wavelengths. Scientists don't always name things particularly creatively...

Credit: The inimitable Bill Watterson

... but they managed to come up with a pretty dramatic-sounding one for the implications of the Rayleigh-Jeans law at shorter wavelengths: the ultraviolet catastrophe. This inconsistency between mathematics and observations remained until 1900, when Max Planck came along with a critical realization: there weren't actually infinite possible standing waves that could exist within a blackbody; rather, the only possibilities were integral multiples of a minimum possible wave energy, or quantum--this shows up as the hc/\lambda in the Planck Function. As a result, the model no longer predicted energy going to infinity at short wavelengths, and the Wien Approximation and Rayleigh-Jeans Law had been tied together rather prettily in an extremely accurate model.

Planck's Function predicts the colored radiation curves, while Rayleigh-Jeans predicts the black curve. (Source)

1 comment: